London recalled that the Minority Leader in a television talk show had said he had seen his file, then changed this to say he didn't see his file, but when confronted with e verbatim report said it was not that he saw it, but that somebody told him that his file was big and that it started in 2005.

The Chief Secretary noted at Thursday's post Executive Council media briefing that in a situation where the Prime Minister was now saying that she did not see it, the Police Commissioner was saying he did not see the file, the National Security Minister was saying he doesn't know, Justice Minister was saying that two men came from Israel and destroyed the files, the question that Tobagonians have got to ask, maybe one of two questions, "who was it that saw the file to tell Mr. Jack what was in the file?"

"Or maybe the most important question of all – did Mr. Jack ever see his file, or conversely did anybody ever tell Mr. Jack anything about his file? And was Mr. Jack more focused on 'gallerying' and posturing about this very serious and sensitive issue," London said.

He asked: "If that is the case, what does that tell you about Mr. Jack's personality and character, to actually use something like this?" London added: According to London, the conclusion to which Tobago is fast coming is that Mr. Jack never saw his file and nobody ever told Mr. Jack about his file. He believes Jack saw this as an opportunity to glorify himself and use what was one of the challenging periods in the history of Trinidad and Tobago for his own personal advancement.

Mr. London said the positive aspect of this was that Tobagonians had an opportunity to look at this, which was a challenge that all countries face. "How do you deal with personal privacy and security issues. I think that it is painful but I think that at the end of day, we are going to come out of this with some kind of better idea as to how we balance these tow very important issues," Mr. London said.