Tools

Are Jack and the TOP Tobagonians?

This column notes with interest that of late and in defence of the selfish stance taken by the TOP leader and some of his members in support of the Attorney General Anand Ramlogan's Green Paper, Mr Jack often says that Mr London and the PNM have no moral authority to speak of greater autonomy for Tobago.

In a two part series, this column would share some of the history of Tobago's autonomy that leaves to question whether Mr Jack and the TOP have lost their vision where autonomy is concerned for this island and the foundation that would have been laid by their forerunners.

Some may argue that our fight for autonomy began with "Sandy the slave" but we should be mindful of Bob Marley's admonishment that though our shackles were removed, mental slavery is our greatest risk.

However, this column begins its review at the point when ANR Robinson's motion was presented in Parliament on the 14th January 1977 and read "Be it resolved that this Honourable House is of the opinion that all proper and necessary steps should be taken to accord the people of Tobago Internal Self Government in 1977".

During that debate on Tobago which was described as a "Special case", and lasted four days, one of the poignant points made was that Tobagonians should govern themselves and secure the economic development of their own land. The process finally came to a decision when on the 23rd September 1980, the late Sir Ellis Clarke, then President assented to the Act 37 of 1980 that created the first Tobago House of Assembly and elections were subsequently held on September 24, 1980.

This resulted in the DAC winning eight of the twelve seats capturing 53% of the votes and P.N.M. 44% of the votes and four seats. ANR Robinson became Chairman of the Assembly and from that time to now, the functions and responsibilities of the Assembly have been an issue.

This column reminds its readers that on 30th September 1982, the then Assembly defended its authority under Act 37 of 1980 when a motion for a just and acceptable union between Trinidad & Tobago was raised by the then Deputy Chairman Dr Jefferson Davidson and stated: "Whereas the union between the Islands of Trinidad and of Tobago being a colonial one was contrary to the will of the people of Tobago; whereas despite the transition of the colony of Trinidad from British colonialism to Independence, the Island of Tobago continues to be forcefully kept in subjection to the will of the people of Trinidad by neo- colonial policies emanating from that Island; and whereas repeated constitutional mandates given to its duly elected representatives by the electorate of Tobago to seek Internal self-Government for Tobago within the Unitary state of Trinidad and Tobago have met with lack of sympathy, indifference and arrogance from the Government in Trinidad; be it resolved that this House of Assembly takes all proper and necessary steps to terminate the present unjust union of Tobago with Trinidad and to secure either its replacement with a union based on terms and conditions acceptable to the authorised representatives of the people of Tobago or the full Independence of Tobago with secure Territorial Boundaries".

This motion by Davidson clearly indicates the on-going challenges that Tobagonians have experienced in an attempt to define and distinguish themselves in the milieu of a twin island country. Today it is no different where the Assembly Bills which hold the views of Tobagonians, that have been submitted to Trinidad have been ignored. Tobagonians quest for defining who is a Tobagonian and to have its territorial boundaries defined within a unitary state, where the maximum point is 200 nautical miles as defined by international marine law and the economic zone, are not being heard.

This column questions whether Mr. Ashworth Jack is aware of this position way back then, a DAC position and a NAR position or is it intentional with the posture he is now taking that moves the TOP away from the previous stance to give Tobago a border of only 10 miles offshore.

The issue of what is Tobago that was not meaningfully described by A.G. Ramlogan's Green Paper to which Mr. Jack and the TOP fully support, is not new and continues to be a major issue for Tobago. This column then asks: "Mr. Jack, do you remember that your party under another name approved a "Tobago Development Plan (1981 - 1990)?" "Mr. Jack, do you remember chart two and chart three after page 52 in that plan?" The TOP ought to remember that those charts reflect maps of what was believed then to be Tobago's natural resources.

On behalf of Tobagonians, this column requests Mr. Jack to explain what does moving from six (6) to ten (10) nautical miles provide to Tobago as supported by him in that Green Paper? Why not 50, 100 or even 200? Unlike the "Green Paper".

During the tenure of the late Lennox Denoon as Chairman of the THA, Prime Minister Patrick Manning discussed with Denoon the possibility of setting up some URP projects in Tobago because several persons from Tobago were saying to the PM that they could not get jobs.

Denoon rejected the offer on the grounds that URP in Tobago was the function of the Assembly; the Prime Minister had to respect that. Today the Minority Leader of the THa has supported the Prime Minister to set up a CEPEP office in Tobago and is encouraging the Government via the Ministers to break the law and interfere with the Assembly's functions, as in the case of Jack's recent meetings and decisions with Devant Maraj that has resulted in yet again fooling Tobagonians about a 24 hour airport facility.

This column is of the view that Jack and the TOP have lost their way and are misleading Tobagonians in support of the Anand Ramlogan Green Paper; and that the two Assembly Bills are the firm and legitimate demand of Tobagonians for equality and respect. Tobagonians must decide what is best for Tobago.

THE Tobago Council

OF THE PNM

You have indicated this comment should be removed.

Close

The comment has been submitted for review. Thank you .

youth said on Monday, Apr 23 at 1:24 PM

Well said Anonymous, I am no supporter of the PNM, TOP/UNC or any of these existing ridiculous political parties and they all really seem to be saying the same nonsense over and over. As a young Tobagonian I would like to ask them what the hell they are doing for us the youths?

88561934
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

citylimer said on Thursday, Apr 12 at 6:34 PM

THA the train is leaving the station. If you allow the train to pick up full speed it will be difficult to stop it, THA has to mount a strong counter attack to shoot down an inferior PP/TOP Bill which does not take cognisance of Tobago's earning capacity which will entitle Tobago to a greater share of the Budget.Additionally, the THA Bill will avert a travestry of justice with reference to voter padding. THA get on a road show now both in Trinidad and in Tobago. ON WITH IT.

87314315
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

RJ said on Tuesday, Apr 10 at 10:01 AM

United we stand devided we fall. We need one love instead of all this devisive squibbling. What do we hope to achieve with all this devision? Is it just power? Will the people of Tobago on the grass roots level be better served?? What will be our revenue earning capacities? How will our education be better improved?? Our security ect??

86912945
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

the virginian said on Monday, Apr 9 at 10:40 AM

Drunk Man,remember that Tobago is negotiating with an 800lb gorilla--Trinidad and the central government.Tobago might want to think it's an equal partner,but in reality,it's not.So the ideal residency requirement of not less than 3 years,though ideal for Tobagonians,might not be so for the other at the table.So to draw a line in the sand and proclaim its demands absent sufficient wiggle room for compromise and concessions will be an exercise in futility.Of course,if Tobagonians are creditable poker players,then I don't expect them to give any indications,before hand,of their hand strength while knowing when to hold,fold or walk away or run.

86821236
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

drunk Man said on Sunday, Apr 8 at 11:45 PM

The Goal is a moving Target, It is destined to fail !! It is the wishes of 99% of Tobagonians that anything under 3 years to vote in a THA election is a None Starter, This is the wish of Tobago people why not respect that?

86795373
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Anonymous said on Sunday, Apr 8 at 9:37 AM

To stupid man , you are all fools

86749794
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

the virginian said on Friday, Apr 6 at 2:59 PM

Citylimer and I previously had exchanges on the proposed 200-nautical mile EEZ and 12-mile territorial waters.Whether or not Tobagonians accept the premise that they are,indeed, negotiating from a position of weakness,from my observation and that of a few others,they are,and to move forward or to realize their ultimate objective,compromise would be necessary.Be prepared.Again,a PLAN A as well as a PLAN B should be on both front burners,ready to go.

86625173
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Desuperman said on Friday, Apr 6 at 1:41 PM

UTTER NONSENSE! You explain what about the the Green Paper that makes more sense to Tobagonians. Some of you definitely take us all for fools with dotish diatribe. Does the GP really give more powers? It proposes a smaller budget allocation than the THA Bill, it allows for someone (Trinidadian) to become eligible to vote in a THA election if they temporarily residing here for as short as 3 months, unlike what the THA Bill proposes. It also proposes 10 nautical mile to be bounding Tobago instead of 200 nautical miles in the other Draft. The GP was (initially) put together by a small group of Tobagonians who are more interested in "history" than Tobago. You cannot come here and say that you "studied" both documents and then expunge that the GP is more "explicit"(?). I disgusted by those like you who continue to use partisanship and be blinded by it, instead of being more meaningful. Deborah Moore's interview on Ch5 Thurs' night was worth viewing, it ripped the GP apart.

86618735
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Anonymous said on Friday, Apr 6 at 12:15 PM

Why is all this fuss about the Green Paper. Mr London you are an intellect and you are aware that persons perfer to study several documents before they arrive to a conclusion. The PNM should allow the Green Paper to run is course and give Tobagonians the opportunity to decide which document will best fit the needs of Tobagonians. I have studied the both documents and they both have good information. However, the Green Paper seems a bit more explicit. Mr london you should not force your bills on the people of Tobago as you did not allow them to be sent out for final consultation. You should now return to the "table" of consultation with your bills and see if the people of Tobago perfer your documents. I would like to warn you if the TOP hit the road and fully explain the green paper it can nullify your bills and cause you the election. You are fully aware that your 200 miles arguement is a hoax and will not stand up in the court of law in Trinidad and Tobago. try it and you will see.

86610584
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Anonymous said on Friday, Apr 6 at 12:03 PM

This is the most shallow piece of writing that I have seen for a longtime. The PNM seems to be redundant and cannot motivate the Tobago Public

86609503
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Add a comment

Name:

Comment: 1000 Characters Left

Tobago News and its affiliated companies are not responsible for the content of comments posted or for anything arising out of use of the above comments or other interaction among the users. We reserve the right to screen, refuse to post, remove or edit user-generated content at any time and for any or no reason in our absolute and sole discretion without prior notice, although we have no duty to do so or to monitor any Public Forum.

Poll

Do you expect tourism to rebound in Tobago in 2012?

  • Yes
  • No